Executive roundtables and CxO events for AI vendors
An executive roundtable works when it gets the right twelve people to talk honestly about a problem your product...
Read more
Role redesign changes what one job does once AI takes on some of its tasks. Organisational redesign changes how teams, decisions and handoffs fit together around AI.
Most organisations start with roles because that feels manageable. The return usually needs both. Organisational redesign is a decision for the leadership team, not a project to hand to HR.
Role redesign looks at one job and asks which tasks AI now does, which it supports, and which stay with the person. The job title often stays the same while the work inside it changes.
The scale is large. BCG’s 2026 analysis of US jobs found that in 43% of them, AI can already do at least 40% of the tasks. It concluded that most of these roles will change shape rather than disappear (BCG, 2026).
Done well, role redesign frees time for work that needs judgement. Done alone, it often frees time that nobody redirects.
Organisational redesign works one level up. It asks how work flows between people, teams and AI across a whole process.
That covers who makes which decisions, where handoffs happen and how many people a manager can oversee. It also decides where agents sit, and who is accountable for their output.
One example is a 187-year-old property firm rebuilding around AI. It started from how the business should run, then worked back to the roles.
Because the work around the role stays the same. A person gets an AI tool and a new job description, but the approvals, reports and handoffs still assume the old way of working.
The numbers show the result. Forrester found that 66% of organisations have AI built into their everyday apps, but only 32% say productivity rose (Forrester, 2026).
In the UK government’s 2026 AI adoption survey, a lack of skills held back 67% of businesses already using AI (DSIT, October 2026). Training helps, but most AI training changes nothing when the workflow does not change with it.
The CEO and COO own organisational redesign, because it changes how the business runs. The CHRO runs the change and protects the people side. Function heads redesign the roles in their area.
Ownership shows up in the results. Among 755 UK mid-market business leaders surveyed by aibl, 62% of organisations where the chief executive owns AI report a measurable return. Where nobody owns it, the figure is 18%.
Agreement matters too. Where the leadership team agrees on AI priorities, 79% report a measurable return, against 37% where it does not.
Start with one process rather than the whole organisation.
They overlap. An AI operating model describes how AI is owned, funded and run across the business. Organisational redesign is the work of changing how the organisation runs so that model actually happens.
HR should run it, with function heads doing the redesign in their own areas. The decisions about how the organisation runs sit with the CEO and COO.
One process can be redesigned in a few months. Use what you learn there before you redesign a second one.
This guide is part of our theme on the AI workforce. Every piece lives on The AI workforce page. Get the next one in aiblBRIEF, our weekly newsletter, and follow the theme through to aiblLIVE on 13 July 2027.
An executive roundtable works when it gets the right twelve people to talk honestly about a problem your product...
Read more
AI agents are AI systems that take actions as well as answer questions. For a leadership team they matter in two...
Read more
Role redesign changes what one job does once AI takes on some of its tasks. Organisational redesign changes how...
Read moreGet ahead with the most actionable insights, playbooks and real-world AI use cases you can adopt right now, in your inbox every week