The AI Amplifier: Moving from Tool Adoption to Work Design with Dr. Laura Weis, WPP
Dr Laura Weis, Global Human AI Strategy Lead at WPP, argues that organisations do not have an AI adoption problem. They have a work design problem...
Watch videoPLUS: Get to really know your prospect in seconds and the rise of shadow agents
This week I had the chance to dig into a study of 3,000 mid-market firms that exposed a significant blind spot: we are drastically underestimating our competitors’ tech adoption. The researchers found that the vast majority of business leaders believed their competitors were far behind where they actually were, to the tune of nearly 25 percentage points.
When these leaders were shown the hard data proving their rivals were already ahead, it triggered a significant response to invest more, but specifically in established hardware.
If you think you are in or ahead of the pack, the data suggests you may well be very wrong.
However, the study revealed a critical nuance that speaks directly to the current moment with AI. While discovering that competitors were using robotics drove firms to immediately increase their own investment plans by nearly 18%, learning about high AI adoption rates did not spark the same urgency.
The researchers suggest that because AI is still viewed as experimental rather than entrenched like robotics, leaders are hesitant to follow the herd without a clear playbook. We are in a “wait-and-see” trap where businesses acknowledge the tech is growing but are paralysed by the lack of mature use cases compared to physical automation.
For those of us focused on Agentic AI, this is the signal to move from experimentation to integration. The study implies that firms currently treat AI as a novelty rather than a structural necessity, unlike robotics which they view as essential for survival.
We cannot afford to wait until AI feels as “safe” and “mature” as a factory robot. By the time Agentic workflows become the standard “safe” bet, the early adopters who pushed past the experimental phase will have already compounded their advantage. Don’t wait for your competitors to prove it works; the data shows they are likely already doing it, quiet and unseen.

How to use AI to scan job ads, blog posts and reviews so you know what a prospect really cares about before you ever write to them.
A founder selling a back-office service into clinics and professional firms hit a wall familiar to almost every outbound team. His product handled scheduling, admin, billing and follow-up calls. The value made sense, but the outreach didn’t. His “AI-powered lead gen” tool scraped homepages, dropped the text into a generic prompt and produced polished but vague messages.
He sent thousands and received little in return. Without real context, every prospect looked identical and every “personalised” email disappeared in the noise. He needed the system to understand the lead before he wrote a single line, so he built a way to do precisely that.
He began collecting signals from places where companies reveal their real priorities. Job postings showed where capacity was stretched. Blog updates and product announcements highlighted upcoming initiatives and long-standing frustrations. Case studies indicated who they were trying to impress, and leadership interviews exposed the pressures shaping their decisions. Public reviews added a final layer by showing what customers felt wasn’t working, in their own words.
NEWS
We’re still collecting real-world wins, misfires and everything in between. If you’ve got a case study that deserves a spotlight, we want to hear it.
Drop a line to John@aiblmedia.com


We’ve been using Apollo.io for a while and it consistently comes up in mid-market conversations. It’s a broad data and outbound tool that helps teams find companies and contacts, build quick segments and get early outreach moving without taking on a heavy contract. The appeal is speed, coverage and the control it gives operators who want to test a market before committing to something larger.
It also fits the shift toward lighter, modular stacks. Teams are pulling back from all-in databases and building around tools they can adjust as they learn. Apollo often sits in the middle of that because it’s easy to work with and steady on cost.
There’s a 14-day trial, which is long enough to see how it handles your segments and whether it gives you the signal you need to take the work further.
“By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it.”
Eliezer Yudkowsky, Founder, MIRI
Dr Laura Weis, Global Human AI Strategy Lead at WPP, argues that organisations do not have an AI adoption problem. They have a work design problem...
Watch video
AI is the ultimate fix: bring in the tools, improve the numbers, move faster. Dr Laura Weis, Global Human AI...
Read more
This week we spoke to the head of sales at a mid-market SaaS firm selling compliance and scheduling software to...
Read moreGet ahead with the most actionable insights, playbooks and real-world AI use cases you can adopt right now, in your inbox every week