Why 96% AI adoption at Make didn’t start with tools or training
Watch the interview here When Sara Maldon joined Make two years ago, there was no approved AI tool. Nobody...
Read morePLUS: 26′ Predictions and a thank you from the aibl Team
As the year winds down, I wanted to say a quick thank-you for reading.
If there’s one thing that’s clear about 2025, it’s that AI in the mid-market is shifting beyond hype into the “so what do we actually do with it?” phase. Less breathless promise and more organisational reality.
Across the UK mid-market, we’ve seen teams wrestling with the similar questions about who owns AI, where value really shows up, how risk is understood (or misunderstood) and how culture often matters more than tooling.
In the new year, we’ll continue focusing on what actually works — practical use cases, honest barriers, and the decisions leaders are making when there’s no perfect playbook to follow.
We’ll also be sharing new research, more case studies and interviews with people making AI a reality, including the speakers you can look forward to meeting at aiblLIVE.
Thank you for your attention, your curiosity and the thoughtful replies. It’s all genuinely appreciated.
Next year will fast paced for us all, so we with you a calm and rejuvenating end to 2025.

Spotting Customers Who Are Leaving Before They Ghost
During a December retention review, a mid-market IT provider found a problem hiding in plain sight. Nearly four in ten of their customers were dormant, showing no meaningful engagement in over 60 days. Revenue was still coming in, but the relationships were already gone. The company had no system to tell which customers were salvageable and which were truly lost.
Where the logic failed
The team initially built an agent to look for “quiet” accounts. It flagged 47 “risky” customers. The Head of Customer Success called ten of them and found that most were perfectly happy.
The issue was that quiet periods are common in managed services, especially when things are working and don’t reliably indicate churn. The team had confused low usage with churn risk.
The Solution: Detector vs. Diagnoser
To add useful nuance, they built a two-stage system and you can too.
NEWS
We’re still collecting stories from the field, what worked, what didn’t, and what surprised you. If you’ve got a case study that belongs on the aiblLIVE stage, get in touch with via John@aiblmedia.com.


This week we’ve been tracking InvGate, a platform gaining traction with mid-market CIOs who find competitors too costly and complex to run day to day. InvGate combines IT service management and asset management in a single platform, keeping tickets, devices, and infrastructure context in one view rather than spread across stitched-together tools.
It stands out for how it tackles a familiar mid-market constraint: high ticket volumes with lean support teams. Through its AI Hub, InvGate deploys a Virtual Service Agent focused on deflection first. It surfaces relevant knowledge inside chat tools like Microsoft Teams or the self-service portal before a ticket is logged.
Once tickets are live, it supports agents with summarisation, solution suggestions, and early signals when SLAs are at risk.
It’s a clear example of pragmatic AI for the mid-market. InvGate deploys quickly, often in days, with transparent per-agent pricing for service management and per-node pricing for assets. Teams can start small and add AI as volumes grow.
Watch the interview here When Sara Maldon joined Make two years ago, there was no approved AI tool. Nobody...
Read more
Voice notes from calls, meeting transcripts, half-formed ideas recorded on the move. They contain commercial...
Read more
For this week's AI in practice, we spoke to the founder of a regional managed IT services provider that had grown...
Read moreGet ahead with the most actionable insights, playbooks and real-world AI use cases you can adopt right now, in your inbox every week