AI in Practice – Automating the First Layer of Customer Contact
A technical lead working with a specialised UK eye clinic explains how they moved from a sticky-note reception...
Read moreDuring a December retention review, a mid-market IT provider found a problem hiding in plain sight. Nearly four in ten of their customers were dormant, showing no meaningful engagement in over 60 days. Revenue was still coming in, but the relationships were already gone. The company had no system to tell which customers were salvageable and which were truly lost.
Where the logic failed
The team initially built an agent to look for “quiet” accounts. It flagged 47 “risky” customers. The Head of Customer Success called ten of them and found that most were perfectly happy.
The issue was that quiet periods are common in managed services, especially when things are working and don’t reliably indicate churn. The team had confused low usage with churn risk.
The Solution: Detector vs. Diagnoser
To add useful nuance, they built a two-stage system and you can too.
The Detector (Rules): A cheap, automated query that identifies anomalies.
The Diagnoser (Agent): An intelligent review of the context to understand why the anomaly happened.
Phase 1: The Detector (The Smoke)
Run a daily script to flag accounts where at least one of these hard signals is true.
| Signal | Threshold (Modify for your business) |
| Usage Drop | Activity down >50% vs. 90-day rolling average. |
| Silence | No ticket, email, or meaningful request in 60 days. |
| Enrichment Flag | External data provider indicates M&A event or leadership change. |
| Renewal Window | Contract expires in <90 days. |
For every account on the Review List, feed a context brief to the Agent. Its job is to classify the specific Strategic Drift driving disengagement.
Example Input Brief:
Customer: Acme Corp
Contract Type: Annual Managed Service
Tickets (Last 30d): 0
Usage Trend: Flat
Last QBR Sentiment: Mixed
Enrichment News: Missed earnings targets, New CFO hired
Support Themes: Price, Competitor mention
Notes (Last 90d): Project complete, Budget freeze mentioned
System Prompt:
Task: Analyze the customer brief and classify the account into one of four risk categories. Your output must be a single, structured diagnosis for this account.
Output Format: Provide a structured response with the following four fields: risk_score, drift_category, reasoning_summary, and strategic_recommendation.
Reasoning Logic:
Output Format:
Provide a structured response with the following four fields:
Example Output:
| Field | Value |
| risk_score | 8 |
| drift_category | Economic Gap |
| reasoning_summary | The customer recently hired a new CFO and missed earnings targets, and internal notes mention a budget freeze. |
| strategic_recommendation | Initiate the ‘Value Realisation’ playbook to proactively defend the account against cost-cutting measures. |
Phase 3: The Operational Workflow
The agent’s structured diagnosis must route automatically into the Customer Success system of record, such as Salesforce or HubSpot.
1. Ingest & Route Don’t dump the data into a spreadsheet. Set up a simple automation (using Zapier, Make, or a custom script) to process the agent’s daily output:
2. The Playbook Mapping The CRM task description should automatically include the Strategic Diagnosis and the specific Human-Led Playbook to run.
| Drift Category | Strategic Diagnosis | Human-Led Playbook (The Script) |
| The Value Gap | Job Done / Outgrown | The ‘Maintenance’ Play: 1. Call to congratulate on success (‘Mission Accomplished’). 2. Propose a down-sell to a maintenance-tier contract. 3. Goal: Keep them on the books at lower ARR rather than 0. |
| The Economic Gap | Price Pressure / ROI | The ‘Value Realisation’ Play: 1. Do not offer a discount yet. 2. Send a ‘Value Report’ showing hours saved or risk avoided. 3. If that fails, offer a roadmap-contingent discount. |
| The Relationship Gap | Ghosting / New DM | The ‘Executive Alignment’ Play: 1. Stop emailing the old contact. 2. Have your Executive Sponsor (CEO or CRO) email the new VP or C-Level peer. 3. Goal: Reset the partnership at the top. |
| The Fit Gap | M&A / Competitor | The ‘Integration Review’ Play: 1. Request a technical review to map your tool against the new parent stack. 2. If blocked, negotiate a clean wind-down. 3. Goal: Preserve reputation for future re-entry. |
Executive Takeaway
Most retention metrics flatter reality by counting payment, not intent. This two-stage system surfaces churn early enough to respond, transforming a lagging indicator into a real-time operational workflow. It directs your team’s attention with precision, ensuring that even if you still lose customers, you lose them on your own terms.
A technical lead working with a specialised UK eye clinic explains how they moved from a sticky-note reception...
Read moreYour AI strategy has stalled - not because of the technology, but because of the people expected to make it...
Read moreWhy AI systems fail when they trust user labels A mid-market construction firm with £79m turnover and 297...
Read moreGet ahead with the most actionable insights, playbooks and real-world AI use cases you can adopt right now, in your inbox every week